Search results

Bank of Russia took a decision (Order No. OD-1894, dated 17 June 2016): to withdraw V. Yu. Aseeva and V.A. Shlykov from the provisional

No. ОD?1890, dated 17 June 2016) as follows: to remove M. A. Danilenko and E. S. Shatskaya from the provisional administration of the above-mentioned

No. ОD?1881, dated 17 June 2016) as follows: to remove M. A. Danilenko from the provisional administration of the above-mentioned credit institution from 20

be published on the Bank of Russia website. Given the need for a month’s preparations before the launch of the scheme, credit institutions will

383,162 of which: – fixed assets1 Х Х Х Х Х Х Х 75,192 Х Х Х Х – advance payments on profit tax – – – – – – – 189

a Microfinance Organisation to Control the Activity of a Liquidation Commission (Liquidator) in Case of Taking a Decision to Liquidate a Microfinance Organisation within a

than a half of them prefer spare money savings. Herewith a proportion of those who prefer bank deposits is on the rise, and a proportion

one is a transition to a floating exchange rate of the ruble. This is a pivotal systemic measure. Though this transition was not a smooth

appointing a receiver in compliance with Clause 3 of Article 18927 of the Federal Law ‘On the Insolvency (Bankruptcy)’, the Bank of Russia took a

Togliatti) the Bank of Russia took a decision (Order No. OD-1839, dated 14 June 2016): to withdraw A.A. Kryazhov from the provisional administration of